User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 52
  1. #1
    Senior Member Par Deus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    14,485
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Technically, should a 9 should just be in the top 10%.

    I don't think many of us actually scale it that way.

    More like where the 50% mark is a zero, and each number represents 5% points up.

    Or would you use something more like normal distribution where it is a parabolic curve (but, again, likely having the actual 50th percentile be a zero), where it is much harder to go from even an 8-9 to an 9-10

    I think I'd call a chick who was truly in the 90 percentile on looks like a 7. And, I've only described 4-5 girls that I have known as a 9.5, though they were probably more like 99-99.9.



    Right-Wing Terrorist Bot 2.010

  2. #2
    Purus Labs Representative
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    7,157
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hehe,nice....I can see you've given this some serious attention to detail.

    I don't employ the 1-10 scale,I'm in favor of a down played approach but the 1-10 scale would be somewhat of a basis.

    That said,1-4 would just be meh,no interest.

    5 would be stickworthy.

    6-7 more would be stickworthy with less potential to loathe myself after sex.

    8-10 would be long term relationship material.

    When I'm with a girl or obsessively trying to get with a girl,I generally think of her as a 10 for sentimental reasons,beyond physical attraction.It's hard to articulate what would make a woman be an 8-10,though.
    Pile of data cannot be equated to the irrefutable truth, no more than a mountain of shit can be scaled to bring one closer to enlightenment.

    No bro-science at Purus because we heart Pubmed and all its peer reviewed studies just too damn much to cheat you with overblown hype.

  3. #3
    Senior Member blarger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,106
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    A girl of height-weight proportionality, with healthy skin is a 5. These correlate most highly with "giving a fuck/not being stupid", so IQ and education levels probably factor in most highly in a girl getting herself from 0 to a 5.

    Increasing the boob and ass sliders to the perfect proportions gets her to 8. Estrogen genetics, mainly, I guess.

    Then, add 1 point for facial structure, and 1 point for hair, lips and other girly cool shit.

    Delete 1 point every 10 years starting at 35

    Add 1 point for every 3 drinks

    In my experience, of under-35 girls, 30% are a 5 or higher... 7.5% are an 8 or higher...

  4. #4
    Purus Labs Representative
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    7,157
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This has all the makings of a classic M&M thread.

    Keep 'em coming,lads.Seriously,I want every fucking one to post,inquiring minds want to know.
    Pile of data cannot be equated to the irrefutable truth, no more than a mountain of shit can be scaled to bring one closer to enlightenment.

    No bro-science at Purus because we heart Pubmed and all its peer reviewed studies just too damn much to cheat you with overblown hype.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Par Deus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    14,485
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Colin @ Dec 26 2009, 04:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Hehe,nice....I can see you've given this some serious attention to detail.

    I don't employ the 1-10 scale,I'm in favor of a down played approach but the 1-10 scale would be somewhat of a basis.

    That said,1-4 would just be meh,no interest.

    5 would be stickworthy.

    6-7 more would be stickworthy with less potential to loathe myself after sex.

    8-10 would be long term relationship material.

    When I'm with a girl or obsessively trying to get with a girl,I generally think of her as a 10 for sentimental reasons,beyond physical attraction.It's hard to articulate what would make a woman be an 8-10,though.</div>

    Well, that would definitely be pretty much a true, 1-10 linear scale approach.



    Right-Wing Terrorist Bot 2.010

  6. #6
    Senior Member Par Deus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    14,485
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default


    Chem and Jinx, yall can reply about dudes (or chicks).



    Right-Wing Terrorist Bot 2.010

  7. #7
    Senior Member Par Deus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    14,485
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default


    Jake and Mr. Kite can comment on dudes, too.



    Right-Wing Terrorist Bot 2.010

  8. #8
    Purus Labs Representative
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    7,157
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Par Deus @ Dec 26 2009, 09:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Well, that would definitely be pretty much a true, 1-10 linear scale approach.</div>

    Yeah,your bit about a parabolic curve threw me off.

    Oh and John Smith is welcome to comment on prepubescent girls,too.
    Pile of data cannot be equated to the irrefutable truth, no more than a mountain of shit can be scaled to bring one closer to enlightenment.

    No bro-science at Purus because we heart Pubmed and all its peer reviewed studies just too damn much to cheat you with overblown hype.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,054
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    What about a logarythmic scale? For example, an 8 is 10X better than a 7. Nah, that would be too picky and require too many decimal places. The linear scale is best I think--9 would be 90th percentile, 2 is 20th percentile, etc.

  10. #10
    Senior Member habit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Upstate..guess which one?
    Posts
    1,603
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Par Deus @ Dec 26 2009, 05:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Technically, should a 9 should just be in the top 10%.

    I don't think many of us actually scale it that way.

    More like where the 50% mark is a zero, and each number represents 5% points up.

    Or would you use something more like normal distribution where it is a parabolic curve (but, again, likely having the actual 50th percentile be a zero), where it is much harder to go from even an 8-9 to an 9-10

    I think I'd call a chick who was truly in the 90 percentile on looks like a 7. And, I've only described 4-5 girls that I have known as a 9.5, though they were probably more like 99-99.9.</div>

    I was about to start this as I referred to my scale in a couple threads now, but since everyone is betting I will OD in 5 days I am busy living each one as it's my last. Hate to dissapoint all of you by NOT dying. Out of curiosity, was my mention of the scale what spurred this on or was it a coininkydink?

    Anyway, I believe you must go out to tenths. These is not understood and actually hated by most all of my friends. There are some chicks that are just not a 6 and not yet a 5...or a 7 for that matter.

    The way I look at it, what deserves more specificity and exactness: An incredibly gorgeous woman (or incredibly ugly for that matter) OR Greg Lougayness /insert any olympic diver here getting that attention to detail for triple axle (wait, I think that's figure skating). You see my point though? It's a no brainer. If ice skating, diving and other somewhat faggy olympic events get looked at so closely and brought out a decimal point, why can't women?

    Also, There is no 10, as in perfect, like I mentioned in the other thread. This also really bothers many of my buds. They throw the word perfect around like it happens often, and it never does as no woman has garnered the perfect 10. I even hesitate strongly to give a specific body part the moniker of perfect, as in "that ass is perfect". Sometimes it's very close but I still hesitate to use that word. What happens when you think you found that perfect chick or even just perfect tits. What would you have to strive for?

    I also believe the curve to be bell shaped if a census was taken and I also leave state of mind and intoxication level as an asterisk to be reviewed when sober.

  11. #11
    Senior Member nightop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    3,013
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Mine is parabolic for sure, along the lines of what Caleb said. Although I do like the binary idea, but don't really see how anyone can operate w/ that in the real world as comparisons are always made no matter how similar two people are.

    This brings up another point/topic, which is at what age in general do men start to "lose it" in terms of purely physical appearance/attraction to women (i.e. sans all of the psychological/evolutionary stuff related to what makes certain main more attractive to women than others regardless of age).

    It seems to me that most men have age-brackets wherein they don't really 'age' during that time in terms of physical characteristics. For instance, a 16-21 year old bracket, 21-32 year old bracket, a 33-45 year old bracket, etc..

    In contrast, most women seem to have a 16-29 year old bracket, but after that they age progressively in general.
    YOU'RE WRONG.

    READ OLD M&M ARTICLES.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Ignored Users List (if you are on this, I can't see your posts):

    SmackThat

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (To add someone to your Ignored Users list, go to My Controls > Manage Ignored Users)

  12. #12
    Senior Member Bachovas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Lalaland
    Posts
    2,140
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    1-4 Look away (no zeros, automatic 1 for having vagina)

    5-6 Fuckable in the right conditions (drunk and horny)

    7-8 Very fuckable (Let's hang out,partially GF material)

    9-10 Keeper (total GF material)

    Personality, face can each add/substract 1 accordingly.
    <span style="font-family:Trebuchet Ms"><span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:100%">"Bad habits are like a comfortable bed, easy to get into, but hard to get out of." -Anonymous-</span></span>

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (chemgoddess1 @ Nov 18 2009, 12:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>So as many of you know my fitness of choice is my pole.</div><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Section 8 @ Nov 5 2009, 02:08 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Know how I know that's the problem? Because, when you're not on drugs, you hate your life. But wait, there's more: when you are on drugs, you hate your life. From this I draw the conclusion that the problem is that you hate your life.</div><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Wise Male Model @ Oct 7 2009, 11:14 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>... tell her that her hair smells like an angel's breath after eating honey and flowers and lavender and shit...</div><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (maxhealth @ Jan 2 2009, 12:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I just look for someone who I like talking to and who isn't ugly.</div> Or fat, for that matter.

  13. #13
    Senior Member LrdViperScrpin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    650
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    www.memeideas.com

    Meme Ideas - Evolve Ideas


    A discussion forum to discuss politics, technology, and science

  14. #14
    Senior Member Par Deus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    14,485
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default


    Sec-8, I see you fucking reading this.

    Chime in.



    Right-Wing Terrorist Bot 2.010

  15. #15
    Senior Member The Bionic Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    624
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Bachovas @ Dec 27 2009, 01:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>(no zeros, automatic 1 for having vagina)</div>

    Now THAT'S classic!

    This is a hard question because everyone has different likes/dislikes, standards, etc...but I guess that could just make the question/answer more general.

    I'm very stingy in my ratings...of anything. IMO, a 10 is reserved for models, actresses, porn stars (all of your choice), etc...and if you know or see a 10 in real life, then they probably should be modeling or acting.

    While I agree tenths is a nice idea, I think that just gives too many rating options. Although I'm all for .5's, and I often use .9's, but never .1 through .

    That said and using tenths, or .5's and above, I'm gonna agree with your original statement of the top 10% being 9 or above. Again, you can put a fair amount of models, actresses, unknown models (like Maxim's Hoemtown Hotties, for instance) in the 9.5 range.

    I don't think I answered the question...even to my own satisfaction...but definitely an interesting question.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    4,097
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Obviously, a 10 represents perfection, something that can't and doesn't exist.

    But even if each of our perfect 10's did exist, let's face it- most of us would get tired of her to some degree and our taste would change as time went on. This would obviously drop her score below a perfect 10.

    It's the nature of men. The grass is greener on the other side of the fence. The other side of the fence being another attractive female.

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,054
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    How do you describe something on a bell shaped curve? Do you put the 9's as 2 standard deviations about the mean, 8's one SD below, make 3-7 all in the middle and have 1 and 2 at the bottom?
    Or do we use something like a scale from 1 to 5 with 3 in the middle as a SD on each side of the mean, with 1 and 2 below average and 4 and 5 above average as respectively 1 and 2 SD's below/above average? (this would be similar to how grades are sometimes figured based on test scores, ABCDF gives us 5 describing units)
    With a bell shaped curve there are proportionately more figures (or women in this case) near the middle so it would also make it kinda hard to differentiate the majority of the population. Unless she is a real great one or a real bad one she would be lumped in with an average category.
    Now I don't know about you guys, but most women I know don't want to be called average [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dry.gif[/img]
    And it doesn't make for very fun guy talk too.

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,941
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Are we talking purely looks? 'Cuz in my book personality plays so much in my rating. Case in point, a girl I know who is a model (bikini BTW) who is cosmetically enhanced to be just about perfect and absolutely gorgeous in photos who I cannot stand to be around because of her personality. I also saw he in Walmart about a year ago with her daughter and it looked like she had more plastic surgery and it was not all that great. This is a girl who naturally was a 9 and then has had her chest done a few times and I think this last time maybe had her nose done. Looking at her made me shudder.


    I score high on the natural beauty stuff, which puts the majority of women in a pretty low classification. I bet 99% of you would fuck this without thinking twice. That is when she has her makeup on.



  19. #19
    Senior Member Par Deus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    14,485
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    5.8


    Right-Wing Terrorist Bot 2.010

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    3,534
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    What, specifically, would you like me to chime in about?

    One thing I will say is that I think this department is programmed by neither biology nor society, though family plays a huge influence. All physical attractiveness research is biased by the fact that most men are cuckolds, and so should be discarded. We live in a woman's world, not a man's world... men don't really have the option of setting standards, unless they're beta.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Married chicks.....
    By Par Deus in forum M&M Lounge Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: December 25th, 2009, 09:27 PM
  2. Hot Chicks Make Men Stupid, Women Still Sociopaths
    By Section 8 in forum M&M Lounge Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: September 16th, 2009, 07:28 PM
  3. On a scale from one to ten...
    By Gahan in forum M&M Lounge Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: January 16th, 2008, 06:06 PM
  4. chicks and breakups and stuff
    By Kow in forum M&M Lounge Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: July 10th, 2003, 10:42 AM
  5. For those with their hands on hot chicks asses.
    By zeppelin in forum Training Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: February 27th, 2003, 06:09 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •